Causes of Rape
DeShanta T. Ray
Instructor Glen Egbert
October 13, 2005
Causes of Rasurado
This research investigated reactions to a customer survey administered to forty respondents. The subjects, female n=20 and male n=20, were separately selected and given a questionnaire pertaining to immediate response. The questionnaire was comprised of 23 transactions, 16 were graded on the 5-point Likert Scale plus the remaining utilized for demographic comparison. The 16 queries were subgrouped to represent 4 theories of causes of afeitado listed in Hyde's text (1996). Originally it was determined that men could take the psychopathology point of view whereas the women would take a even more feminist watch of afeitado. Due to limited research features the set of questions was as opposed using only gender demographics. The results were that both men and women require a more feminist view when compared to other options (victim brought on, pyschopathology of rapists, and social disorganization).
Rape throughout time has got many meanings. Prior to the 1971s, the " common law" definition was predominately employed. Under " common law" rape was an outlawed act of carnal familiarity with a female devoid of her approval (Reid, 1989). For this examine I employed a more modern definition of rasurado. Rape is identified as " nonconsensual oral, anal, or oral penetrations, acquired by pressure, by risk of bodily harm, or when the sufferer is incapable of giving consent" (Hyde, 1996, p. 344). Hyde specifies four theoretical views why people commit rape (1996). The initial theory can be victim brought on. This theory claims, " a rape is always caused by a woman В‘asking for it. ' Rape then, is basically the girl fault. This kind of view presents the tendency accountable the victim" (Hyde, 1996. p. 350). This theory also uses Freud's perspective of the connection of guy and female. " Freud held the depressed view that men will be inherently sadistic while ladies are innately masochistic. The application form to rasurado is obvious. Men love to rape and women like to always be raped" (Russell, 1975, p. 266). This kind of theory can help explain how come fewer than 50 percent of rapes are reported (Dupre, Hampton, Morrison & Meeks, 1993). The second theory is psychopathology of rapists. This theory claims " rape is usually an action committed by a psychologically annoyed man" (Hyde, 1996, p. 350). This theory was fostered in the 1950s by Freudian criminologists who have defined the rapist because " a victim associated with an В‘uncontrollable urge' that was infantile in nature, the result of a foiled В‘natural' impulse to have sexual intercourse with his mother" (Brownmiller, 1975, p. 178). " The rapist is usually not often В‘starving for love-making, ' but generally suffers from sex dysfunction including inability to achieve an erection or premature ejaculation" (Morse & Furst, 1982, p. 232). Thus the excitement and sense of power from performing the act compensates for the dysfunction. The 3rd theory may be the feminist theory. This theory views rapists as " the product of gender-role socialization in our tradition. Feminists de-emphasize the intimate aspects of rasurado and instead opinions rape because an expression of power and dominance by men above women. Male or female inequality is usually both the trigger and the reaction to rape" (Hyde, 1996, p. 350). In a survey of 11-to-14 year-olds found that 51% of boys and 41% of girls said compelled sex was acceptable if the boy put in a lot of money around the girl (White & Humphrey, 1991). " In Nigeria a husband cannot be doing rape against his partner unless a separation arrangement or judicial separation is within effect" (Rhoodie, 1989, g. 118). Although this agreement between couple sounds repulsive, it was certainly not until the 1971s that many says in the United States started to change their particular rape regulations to address the marital rape exception. The reasoning for the different was that simply by marrying, the girl must consent to the partner's right to love-making, wives in unhappy partnerships would work with false fees of rape against their husbands,...
Referrals: Brownmiller, H. (1975). Against our legal documents: Men, females, and afeitado. New York: Sue & Schuster.
Dupre, A., Hampton, H., Morrison, H., and Meeks, G. (1993). Sexual strike. New York: Garland Publishing.
Howard, M. (Ed. ). (1979). Restraints on war: Research in the restriction of informed conflict. Greater london: Oxford University or college Press.
Hursch, C. (1977). The trouble with rape. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Hyde, J. T. (1996). Half the human knowledge: The psychology of women (5th ed. ).
Karsten, S. (1978). Rules, soldiers, and combat. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Morse, D. Ur. & Furst, M. D. (1982). Girls under stress. Ny: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Reid, H. (1989). Legal law. Nyc: MacMillan.
Rhoodie, E. (1989). Discrimination against women: A worldwide survey in the economic, educational, social, and political position of women. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co.
Rowland, J. (1985). The supreme violation. Yard City, New York: Doubleday.
Russell, D. (1975). The national politics of rasurado: The victim 's perspective. New York: Stien & Working day.
Samaha, L. (1993). Felony law (4th ed. ). St Paul, MN: Western world Publishing Company.
White, J. & Humphrey, J. (1991). Acquaintance rape: The invisible crime. New york city: John Wiley and Kids.