The Oedipal sophisticated can still be seen today in several forms of press, including The Simpsons television series. " Tennis the Menace” plainly reflects the Oedipal archetype which makes this kind of piece suitable for analyzing. The episode makes two very clear connections – one to the play " Oedipus the King” plus the other to Freud's hypotheses.
This specific episode recreates scenes which might be similar to the perform. It employs the same standard plot inside the pattern of the son planning to replace his father to be with his mom. The heroes Bart, Homer and Marge are similar to Oedipus, Laius and Jocasta respectively. Bart is known as a mould of Oedipus. He feels the necessity to replace his dad and so he can satisfy his wants to be with his mother. He holds his mother's hand and moves away stating, " The lady has spoken, ” which can be similar to just how Oedipus required his single mother's hand in matrimony. Homer, seeing this, feels defensive of Marge comparable to how Laius felt threatened that his son was destined to kill him and marry Jocasta. Lastly, Marge is quite naive seeing that she fails to realize that Homer is struggling by the reality of burning off her instead of losing a game title to her. This is accurate to how Jocasta was blinded throughout the play. The routine these characters follow shows why the Oedipal archetype is applicable to the media piece.
The Psychoanalytic Perspective manufactured by Sigmund Freud is broken into two parts: the three mental structures plus the Oedipus and Electra complexes. Bart goes thru the subconscious stage of sexual desire pertaining to his mom and wants to replace his father. Lisa also displays the Electra complex seeing that she retaliates against her mother and wants to be loved by her father. We could assume that both equally children have gone through the periods of id, ego and superego, thus according to Freud, they may have repressed all their feelings in the subconscious.
This event can be considered the two indicative and reflective with the archetype. It really is indicative as it suggests...